{"id":76,"date":"2010-09-14T17:38:30","date_gmt":"2010-09-15T00:38:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/?p=76"},"modified":"2010-09-14T17:38:30","modified_gmt":"2010-09-15T00:38:30","slug":"workflow-diagram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/2010\/09\/workflow-diagram\/","title":{"rendered":"Workflow Diagram"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><span style=\"color: #888888;\">And Let the Diagramming Begin!<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Like any diagramming process, there are various flavors of this document, but any work flow must cover six essential aspects per process:<\/p>\n<p>1. When does the process begin? (If preceded by a specified process, indicate the name of that process.)<br \/>\n2. What happens during the process?<br \/>\n3. What determines that the process has ended?<br \/>\n4. What determines that the process has not ended successfully?<br \/>\n5. What is the next step in the process when completed successfully?<br \/>\n6. What is the next step when the process has not completed successfully?<\/p>\n<p>The Work Flow Diagram should not contain a lot of detail, after all this is a diagram, and those boxes are just so large. &#8211; Ok, you can make them bigger, but why should it take the developer or stakeholder a half-hour or so, using a magnifying glass, to read the content of your boxes. Save the detail for your Use Cases. Keep your content brief.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, here&#8217;s a quick word on the difference between a Workflow Diagram and an Activity Diagram. Workflow Diagrams are fairly flexible and easy to read. They don&#8217;t have a UML specification. Most companies seem to prefer such diagrams over Activity Diagrams. Non-technical persons have no problem reading these diagrams. However, even if a particular diagram is not defined by a UML standard, it adds a lot to the consistency of your work if you format non-standard diagrams according to UML specifications as much as it makes sense.<\/p>\n<p>If, however, you are contracting with a client, such as the US Government who generally embraces UML standards, then I would still use the Workflow Diagram to get sign-off on the business process and then create the Activity Diagram as a way to begin the solution architecture. Activity Diagrams are more geared toward the developer and tend to be a bit harder for non-technical business persons to comprehend. They are defined by a UML specification.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Articles Additional Resources<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These links should give you a solid overview of what a Workflow Document is and offer some helpful patterns.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Workflow\" target=\"_blank\">Wikipedia article on the Workflow Diagram<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Business_process_modeling\" target=\"_blank\">Brief Wikipedia article on Business Process Modeling<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.workflowpatterns.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Repository for Workflow Modeling Patterns<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Windows_Workflow_Foundation\" target=\"_blank\">Windows Workflow Foundation<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/sites\/default\/Files\/Examples\/BusinessProcessFlow.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Business Process Workflow<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/sites\/default\/Files\/Examples\/TechnicalWorkflow.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Technical Process Workflow<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And Let the Diagramming Begin! Like any diagramming process, there are various flavors of this document, but any work flow must cover six essential aspects per process: 1. When does the process begin? (If preceded by a specified process, indicate the name of that process.) 2. What happens during the process? 3. What determines that<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/2010\/09\/workflow-diagram\/\" class=\"themebutton2\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-product-owner"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":107,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76\/revisions\/107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.larrylawhead.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}